Joey Buttafuoco is a name that appears in news archives and popular discussion, often tied to a high-profile incident from the 1990s. This profile provides a clear, sourced overview of his identity, background, and publicly recorded details, avoiding rumor and focusing on what is documented. It explains who he is, where he comes from, what occurred in the events for which he is known, and how he has been described in official and media reports. The aim is to present durable information that remains useful for understanding ongoing public interest.
Identity and basic background
Joey Buttafuoco is an American man whose name became widely known in the early 1990s. Public records and news sources identify him as a former car repair shop owner. He was born in the United States and grew up on Long Island, New York, where he later operated a business. His full name and date of birth appear in court and biographical materials. The following table summarizes key, verifiable attributes that are consistently referenced in official documentation and reputable reporting.
Quick facts at a glance
| Attribute | Verified detail | Source type |
|---|---|---|
| Common name | Joey Buttafuoco | Court records, news archives |
| Place of residence at notoriety | Massapequa, Long Island, New York, United States | Local news, court filings |
| Reported birth year | 1956 | Biographical summaries |
| Occupation (noted) | Former auto repair shop owner | Business records, news reports |
Notable public events
Joey Buttafuoco is most frequently mentioned in relation to an incident that drew significant media attention in the 1990s. According to court documents and news coverage, a civil case and subsequent criminal charges were pursued involving allegations of a relationship with a minor and related offenses. The legal process included a guilty plea on certain charges and a sentence that involved time served and probation. Details about the events, charges, and resolution are shaped by court records and reporting from the period. Below is a concise timeline based on documented milestones rather than commentary.
Timeline of documented milestones
| Date or period | Event | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 onward | Alleged ongoing relationship and related conduct | Forms the basis of public record and legal action |
| 1992 | Initial complaints and civil suit filed | Triggers wider public and legal attention |
| 1993 | Criminal charges brought; guilty plea on selected charges | Reflects formal judicial outcomes |
| 1990s | Serving sentence including jail and probation | Demonstrates resolution phase under court supervision |
Public narrative and cultural attention
Beyond legal records, Joey Buttafuoco became part of broader public discourse through television interviews, documentaries, and retrospective commentary. Media coverage at the time often framed the story around issues of age, authority, and accountability. Some outlets presented him as a cautionary figure, while legal materials emphasized procedural facts. In cultural retrospectives, the case is sometimes cited in discussions about crime and media in the 1990s. It is important to distinguish between factual reporting, opinion-based framing, and verifiable court outcomes when evaluating his public narrative.
Legal outcomes and records
The legal resolution involving Joey Buttafuoco is documented in court files and news reports from the era. He entered a guilty plea on certain charges, which resulted in a sentence that combined incarceration and probation. Civil proceedings related to the case were also settled, with financial components addressed in court-approved arrangements. These outcomes are recorded in judicial records and are not based on external interpretation. The following list highlights the core components of the documented legal resolution.
- Guilty plea entered on specified charges
- Jail sentence served, followed by a probation period
- Civil case resolved with agreed terms
- Fines and restitution addressed in court documentation
- Ongoing legal obligations, if any, tied to the case
Long-term relevance and references
Joey Buttafuoco remains a reference point in true crime and cultural discussions about the 1990s. Because many summaries and articles revisit the case years later, it is useful to anchor understanding in primary materials such as court documents and reputable news archives. This approach helps maintain clarity amid varying portrayals. The table below contrasts common descriptors with what is supported by verifiable sources.
| Descriptor | Verified basis | Interpretation level |
|---|---|---|
| Notorious figure | Widespread media coverage in the 1990s | Media-driven, not legal judgment |
| Auto shop owner | Business registration and news accounts | Factual |
| Subject of criminal charges | Court records and guilty plea | Judicially established |
| Cultural cautionary tale | Analysis in media retrospectives | Interpretive, not factual |
FAQ
Reader questions
What is Joey Buttafuoco known for?
He is known primarily for a high-profile case in the early 1990s that involved criminal charges and a civil suit related to his relationship with a minor. The case received extensive media coverage and resulted in a guilty plea and sentence as recorded in court documents.
Where does Joey Buttafuoco live now?
Specific current residence is not detailed in widely available public records. Post-release information is limited in accessible databases, and reliable, up-to-date location information is not routinely disclosed in public sources.
Has Joey Buttafuoco spoken publicly since the case?
There are occasional interviews and references in retrospective documentaries, but consistent, formal public statements are rare. Most available content revisits the case through archival footage or secondary analysis.
What sources are most reliable about Joey Buttafuoco?
Court filings, legal summaries, and reputable news organizations from the early 1990s offer the most verifiable information. Opinion pieces and entertainment-format retrospectives may emphasize dramatization over documented detail. For ongoing clarity, treat new claims about the case with demand for primary sourcing, and prioritize documents such as court records and investigative journalism from established outlets. This facts-first approach supports a durable, ethically framed understanding.