Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn son in 2002, sparking national debate over evidence, motive, and legal strategy. Understanding the trial requires examining the high-profile defense team assembled to represent him in one of California’s most closely watched cases.
The choice of attorney, approach to media, and key courtroom decisions shaped public perception and the eventual outcome. Below is a structured overview of the primary figures and their roles in the prosecution versus defense dynamic.
| Role | Name | Law Firm / Affiliation | Key Function in the Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Scott Peterson | Pro Se (represented by appointed counsel) | Accused of murdering Laci Peterson and their unborn child Conner |
| Lead Defense Attorney | David Grabias | Grabias Law Group | Managed trial strategy, direct and cross-examination, and sentencing phase |
| Co-Counsel | James M. Hyland | Hyland & Soderberg | Assisted with investigation, discovery, and trial preparation |
| Investigator | Detective Stan Stojkowicz | Modesto Police Department (originally); defense consultant later | Provided law enforcement perspective for defense theory and rebuttal evidence |