Introduction
The chilling whispers of the *Five Nights at Freddy’s* universe often lead back to one horrifying event: the bite of ’87 fnaf. It’s an incident shrouded in mystery, a moment that has captivated and confounded fans since the very beginning. It’s a linchpin in the game’s complex lore, fueling countless theories and leaving a lingering sense of unease that perfectly embodies the franchise’s unsettling charm. But what exactly *is* the bite of ’87 fnaf?
For those unfamiliar with the world of animatronic horror, *Five Nights at Freddy’s* is a series of survival horror games created by Scott Cawthon. Players typically take on the role of a night security guard at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, a family entertainment center. However, the animatronic characters that are supposed to entertain the children become increasingly hostile at night. Players must use limited resources to survive until morning, avoiding being caught and, shall we say, repurposed by these terrifying machines. The game cleverly uses jump scares, ambient sounds, and cryptic lore to build a world of suspense and dread.
The bite of ’87 fnaf itself is an incident referenced in the original game, a tragic event that occurred sometime before the player’s arrival. The specifics are deliberately vague, but what we do know is that a child was bitten, supposedly by an animatronic, resulting in the loss of their frontal lobe. This gruesome detail is enough to spark the imagination, and it’s precisely this ambiguity that has made the bite of ’87 fnaf such a compelling and enduring mystery.
This article will delve into the prevailing theories surrounding the bite of ’87 fnaf, examining the available evidence and exploring why this event remains a central, albeit unsolved, puzzle piece in the *FNAF* canon. It is important to remember that as of now, nothing is truly confirmed, so we can only make assumptions with the evidence available.
The Context of the Bite
Understanding when the bite of ’87 fnaf occurred within the sprawling *FNAF* timeline is crucial to piecing together the puzzle. Due to the fragmented nature of the storytelling in the *FNAF* series, pinpointing the exact date of the bite is a challenge. However, considering the dialogue and events across *FNAF 1* and *FNAF 2*, it’s widely believed that the bite happened sometime *before* the events of *FNAF 1*. Many believe the most likely culprit is in *FNAF 2*.
The *FNAF* universe is populated by a cast of animatronic characters, each with their own unique design and alleged personality. Some of the most prominent and relevant animatronics to the bite of ’87 fnaf include: Freddy Fazbear, Bonnie, Chica, Foxy, Golden Freddy, Mangle, Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, Toy Chica, Balloon Boy, and The Puppet. While some appear harmless enough during the day, their behavior at night suggests a hidden agenda, hinting at the sinister secrets lurking within Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza.
Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza itself serves as the primary setting for many of the *FNAF* games. The restaurant presents a deceptively cheerful façade, with colorful decorations, singing animatronics, and the promise of fun and games. However, beneath the surface lies a history of malfunctions, unexplained incidents, and a pervasive sense of unease. The restaurants themselves feel aged and poorly kept, which sets the stage for an incident like the bite of ’87 fnaf. The state of disrepair, combined with the animatronics’ strange behavior, creates an environment where anything can happen, and often does.
Animatronics Under Scrutiny
The identity of the animatronic responsible for the bite of ’87 fnaf is the subject of intense debate within the *FNAF* community. Numerous theories have been proposed, with certain animatronics emerging as the prime suspects.
Mangle: A Popular Suspect
Perhaps the most widely accepted theory points to Mangle, one of the toy animatronics introduced in *FNAF 2*. Mangle’s design is intentionally unsettling, a mangled mess of wires and endoskeleton parts. What once was a beautiful character is now a chaotic collection of metal and plastic, but it has the potential to be the true culprit of the bite of ’87 fnaf. Its jaw seems particularly prominent and menacing, and its broken form, according to popular theories, suggests a history of violent incidents. Mangle’s jumpscare in *FNAF 2* is often cited as evidence, as it appears to bite down directly on the player’s head, which is positioned at a similar height to a child. Additionally, Mangle’s general aggression and erratic movements further contribute to the suspicion surrounding the animatronic.
However, some argue against the Mangle theory, pointing to the fact that Mangle’s jaw might not be strong enough to cause such a severe injury. Also, some believe Mangle is too far away from the camera when it jumpscares, making the height and bite positioning unreliable.
Foxy: The Out-of-Order Pirate
Foxy, the pirate fox animatronic from the original *FNAF*, has also been implicated in the bite of ’87 fnaf. Foxy’s “Out of Order” status, coupled with its aggressive behavior and prominent hook and teeth, makes it a potential candidate. Many fans believe that the “Out of Order” sign is related to the bite. The hook is clearly sharp enough to cause damage and Foxy’s aggression gives it the right kind of motive.
Some argue against the Foxy theory, noting that Foxy is typically contained within Pirate Cove and that there is no explicit evidence of Foxy causing any harm to children before the bite of ’87 fnaf. The “Out of Order” sign may just be due to mechanical issues and Foxy’s aggression may be due to a glitch in its programming.
Freddy Fazbear and Golden Freddy
Freddy Fazbear, the titular character of the *FNAF* series, and his spectral counterpart, Golden Freddy, are sometimes considered as possible suspects for the bite of ’87 fnaf. Freddy’s role as the main antagonist, combined with the dark undertones associated with his character, has led some to speculate that he may have been involved. Golden Freddy, with his mysterious and unsettling presence, also raises suspicion, but the evidence is relatively weak.
However, these theories face the challenge of explaining why these characters would suddenly deviate from their established behavior. Also, Freddy and Golden Freddy don’t really have any noticeable mouth-based dangers, making them an unlikely suspect for the bite of ’87 fnaf. The other characters have more to go on.
Other Possible Culprits
While Mangle, Foxy, and Freddy are the most popular suspects, other animatronics have also been suggested as potential culprits. Toy Bonnie and Toy Chica, with their more child-friendly designs, have been considered, though the evidence is less compelling. The Puppet, with its mysterious nature and ambiguous motives, has also been mentioned, but again, the connection to the bite of ’87 fnaf is tenuous at best. These are much more unlikely suspects, given what evidence there is to go on.
Evidence and Clues From the Games
Delving into the games themselves can reveal subtle hints and clues that shed light on the bite of ’87 fnaf. The *FNAF* series is known for its cryptic storytelling, often leaving players to decipher the truth from fragmented information.
Dialogue and Hints
One of the most significant sources of information is the Phone Guy, a character who provides instructions and exposition to the player in the early games. His dialogue in *FNAF 1* and *FNAF 2* contains subtle references to past incidents, including mentions of animatronic malfunctions and safety concerns. While he doesn’t explicitly describe the bite of ’87 fnaf, his comments hint at a darker history surrounding the restaurant. Also, the newspaper clippings that appear in *FNAF 1* provide glimpses into the restaurant’s past, hinting at closures and incidents that could be related to the bite of ’87 fnaf. These news clippings can provide more context to help figure out what exactly happened.
Gameplay Mechanics
The gameplay mechanics themselves can offer clues about the bite of ’87 fnaf. The animatronics’ attack patterns, their movements throughout the restaurant, and the ways in which they interact with the player can all be interpreted as potential hints. For instance, Mangle’s tendency to climb on the ceiling and approach the player from above is often cited as evidence that it could have been responsible for the bite, due to its angle of attack.
Easter Eggs and Secrets
The *FNAF* games are filled with hidden easter eggs and secrets, many of which remain undiscovered or unexplained. Some fans speculate that these hidden elements might contain clues about the bite of ’87 fnaf, though these theories are often based on speculation and interpretation. The *FNAF* games often hide context behind easter eggs, so some may have yet to be discovered.
Victim Theories
There is also speculation for *who* the victim of the bite was. There is rampant speculation surrounding this topic and it is often brought up when discussing the bite of ’87 fnaf. Some possible victims include Jeremy Fitzgerald, a night guard in *FNAF 2*. Others believe that the victim may be one of the Afton family members, although no definitive conclusions have been made.
It is important to remember that as of now, nothing about the victim is confirmed. They only things we know about the bite is that the victim lost their frontal lobe and that an animatronic caused it.
Why the Bite of ’87 Matters
The bite of ’87 fnaf is more than just a gruesome detail in a horror game. It’s a pivotal event that has shaped the trajectory of the entire *FNAF* series. The incident directly led to changes in the way Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza operated, including stricter safety measures and the eventual closure of certain locations. It has fueled countless fan theories and discussions, solidifying its place as a central point of interest in the *FNAF* community.
The bite of ’87 fnaf serves as a constant reminder of the dangers lurking within Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, underscoring the sense of unease and uncertainty that permeates the series. It keeps fans constantly asking the question of *why* this happened.
Scott Cawthon’s decision to leave the bite of ’87 fnaf unsolved may be deliberate, a clever way to keep fans engaged and speculating. The ambiguity surrounding the event allows for endless interpretation and encourages fans to continue exploring the *FNAF* universe in search of answers. It keeps fans searching and theorizing years after the game first launched.
Conclusion
The bite of ’87 fnaf remains one of the most enduring and perplexing mysteries in the *Five Nights at Freddy’s* franchise. While numerous theories have been proposed, ranging from Mangle’s menacing jaw to Foxy’s aggressive behavior, the true culprit remains officially unknown. The evidence is fragmented and open to interpretation, leaving fans to grapple with conflicting clues and unanswered questions.
The bite of ’87 fnaf is a testament to Scott Cawthon’s masterful storytelling, a haunting reminder of the darkness lurking beneath the surface of Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza. It serves as a catalyst for countless fan theories and discussions, solidifying its place as a central point of interest in the *FNAF* community. The bite of ’87 fnaf continues to fuel speculation.
Will the mystery of the bite of ’87 fnaf ever be definitively solved, or will it forever remain one of *FNAF*’s most enduring enigmas? Only time (and perhaps future installments in the series) will tell.
