food-safety

Waterfront Bistro Raw Shrimp Recall: What Happened and What to Know

Below is a concise summary of the most verified details currently available about the waterfront bistro raw shrimp recall. This table is updated as official statements and regul...

Mara Ellison
Waterfront Bistro Raw Shrimp Recall: What Happened and What to Know

Key facts at a glance

Below is a concise summary of the most verified details currently available about the waterfront bistro raw shrimp recall. This table is updated as official statements and regulatory filings are published.

AttributeVerified DetailSource Type
Product(s) recalledRaw shrimp items served at waterfront bistro locations and retail partnersCompany notice / regulatory filing
Recall classificationClass II (potential temporary health risk)Regulatory agency announcement
Primary concernPresence of Listeria monocytogenes in raw shrimpLaboratory testing results
Distribution scopeSelect metro and coastal marketsLogistics records / public statement
TimelineInitiated in 2025; ongoing coordination with regulatorsRegulatory docket / corporate update
Symptoms of concernFever, muscle aches, nausea, possible invasive infection in high-risk groupsPublic health guidance

What this recall means for diners

The waterfront bistro raw shrimp recall centers on ready-to-eat raw shrimp that tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes, a pathogen that can cause serious illness. This is classified as a Class II recall, indicating a temporary health risk that is serious but not immediately life-threatening in most cases. The affected shrimp was distributed to selected bistro locations and certain retail channels in coastal and metro markets. If you have purchased or consumed the product, specific actions can reduce risk, and understanding the context helps clarify both immediate steps and long-term implications.

Background on the recall

Regulatory testing identified Listeria monocytogenes in samples of raw shrimp supplied to the waterfront bistro chain. In response, the company expanded the recall beyond the initial lot to include related products that presented a potential contamination risk. Class II recalls, as defined by food-safety authorities, apply to situations where exposure may cause temporary or medically reversible health consequences, or where the probability of serious illness is remote. This announcement reflects coordination between the brand, suppliers, and food-safety regulators to address the issue before illnesses progressed. Going forward, ongoing sampling and audits are expected to reinforce preventive controls.

Possible health risks and symptoms

Listeria monocytogenes can cause listeriosis, with symptoms such as fever, muscle aches, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. In more severe cases, the infection can spread to the nervous system, leading to headaches, stiff neck, confusion, or convulsions. People who are pregnant, elderly, immunocompromised, or living with chronic conditions face higher risk of invasive illness and may experience more serious outcomes. Anyone who suspects they have consumed affected shrimp and is experiencing concerning symptoms should contact a healthcare provider promptly. Early evaluation and, when appropriate, testing and treatment can improve outcomes.

Practical steps for consumers and restaurants

If you have the affected shrimp in your home or inventory, do not taste or serve it. Check lot codes and packaging against official recall notices, then return the product to the point of purchase or follow disposal instructions. Restaurants should remove the item from menus and isolate any remaining product until further guidance from regulators. Clear communication to staff and guests helps prevent accidental exposure and supports trust. Moving forward, heightened verification of suppliers, enhanced receiving checks, and proper cooking procedures remain important components of a robust seafood safety program.

How recalls work and why they matter

Food recalls are typically initiated when testing, inspections, or illness reports indicate a potential hazard. Companies may voluntarily issue a recall, or regulators can request one when the risk is significant. Classifications such as Class I, Class II, and Class III reflect the severity and likelihood of harm, guiding how aggressively the recall is pursued. Transparent communication, traceability, and swift corrective actions are central to minimizing health impacts and maintaining public confidence. For consumers, understanding these frameworks makes it easier to interpret announcements and respond appropriately.

Outlook and ongoing considerations

The waterfront bistro raw shrimp recall highlights the importance of continuous monitoring across the seafood supply chain. Preventive measures such as supplier audits, pathogen testing plans, and clear internal protocols help reduce the likelihood of future issues. As more information becomes available, updated guidance from regulators and the company will refine how the incident is managed and how operations are adjusted. In the meantime, staying informed through official channels and following recommended steps can help protect health and reinforce responsible practices across the industry.

Related Reading

More pages in this topic cluster.

Cookie Dough Stores in New York City: What to Know Before You Buy

In New York City, cookie dough is sold in shops, markets, and pop-ups, but not all of it is ready to eat. Some products are heat-treated and shelf-stable, while others are raw a...

Read next
Genova Tuna Recall 2026: What We Know and What It Means

Below are verified attributes and reported details about the 2026 Genova tuna recall, where available from regulators and the company. This table is updated as official statemen...

Read next
Egg recall in Arizona: what to know, step by step

An egg recall in Arizona, as in any state, occurs when authorities or a company identify safety risks—commonly Salmonella—that may affect distributed products. This overview...

Read next